BENQI vs Stader Labs: Staking Comparison 2026
Side-by-side analysis of fees, APY, supported assets, and risks to help you pick the right staking platform.
BENQI vs Stader Labs: which should a beginner choose?
If this is one of your first staking platforms, don't just pick the higher APY. BENQI advertises more (~8.0% vs ~5.5%), but for a beginner the easier, safer platform usually beats a slightly bigger number. Look at how simple sign-up is, whether the platform holds your keys, and how clear the fees are before you commit.
A simple way to decide
Choose BENQI if its strengths match what you value; choose Stader Labs if its do. As a rule of thumb, beginners tend to prefer the platform with the lower risk rating, clearer fees, and a longer track record — even at a slightly lower yield. Start with a small amount on whichever you pick, confirm you can withdraw when you expect to, then scale up once you're comfortable.
BENQI vs Stader Labs — Feature comparison
| Feature | BENQI | Stader Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Avg APY | 8.0%✓ | 5.5% |
| TVL | $0.4B | $0.9B✓ |
| Risk level | medium | medium |
| Custody | Non-custodial | Non-custodial |
| Fees | 10% of staking rewards | 10% of staking rewards |
| Min stake | 0 AVAX | 0.1 ETH / varies by chain |
| Lock period | Flexible (sAVAX is liquid) | Flexible |
| Assets supported | 1+ assets | 6+ assets✓ |
| Insurance | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Audit status | ✅ Audited | ✅ Audited |
| Our rating | 4.0/5 | 4.0/5 |